Re: Republic targeted for sale of 'unhackable' system

2000-11-16 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Willi am Knowles writes: Snakeoil? [Smells like it. --Perry] http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/finance/2000/1110/fin10.htm I don't know if it's really snake-oil -- it's possible, of course, that they've developed a new, useful encryption algorithm, though of

E-Larm (was: Re: Republic targeted for sale of 'unhackable' system )

2000-11-16 Thread Trei, Peter
It has all the hallmarks of snakeoil. After a bit of searching around, I found another article at the Sunday Times (not noted for it's fact checking) and a company site. I'll include their page on the method below. It looks like typical snake oil - the description includes a number of errors

Lots of random numbers

2000-11-16 Thread Rich Salz
I'm putting together a system that might need to generate thousands of RSA keypairs per day, using OpenSSL on a "handful" of Linux machines. What do folks think of the following: take one machine and dedicate it as an entropy source. After 'n' seconds turn the network card into promiscuous mode,

Re: New Scientist article re: the Riemann hypothesis

2000-11-16 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
+ "P.J. Ponder" [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | There is an interesting article in the New Scientist about attempts to | prove the Reimann Hypothesis. Alain Connes is one of the people | mentioned; he's working on a method based on quantum chaos. The article | doesn't mention cryptography, oddly, among

Re: Lots of random numbers

2000-11-16 Thread Ray Dillinger
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Rich Salz wrote: I'm putting together a system that might need to generate thousands of RSA keypairs per day, using OpenSSL on a "handful" of Linux machines. What do folks think of the following: take one machine and dedicate it as an entropy source. After 'n' seconds

Lots of random numbers

2000-11-16 Thread Eugene . Leitl
Rich Salz writes: I'm putting together a system that might need to generate thousands of RSA keypairs per day, using OpenSSL on a "handful" of Linux machines. What do folks think of the following: take one machine and dedicate it as an entropy source. After 'n' seconds turn the network

Re: Lots of random numbers

2000-11-16 Thread Eric Murray
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 10:19:53PM -0500, Rich Salz wrote: I'm putting together a system that might need to generate thousands of RSA keypairs per day, using OpenSSL on a "handful" of Linux machines. What do folks think of the following: take one machine and dedicate it as an entropy source.

Re: Lots of random numbers

2000-11-16 Thread Paul Crowley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why don't you stick a sound card (the noisier, the better) into each node, and dump /dev/dsp (LSB) input at max amplification into the randomness pool? There's no reason to put only the LSBs in the randomness pool, if the pool is properly designed. Put all the data

RE: Lots of random numbers

2000-11-16 Thread Trei, Peter
Others have responded as to why this is not so hot an idea. It sounds like your trying to obtain more entropy than you really need - I would have thought that the built in hardware RNG in the newer Intel chips would do the job. Barring that, stick in one of the various cryptographic coprocessor

Re: Lots of random numbers

2000-11-16 Thread Arnold G. Reinhold
At 10:19 PM -0500 11/15/2000, Rich Salz wrote: I'm putting together a system that might need to generate thousands of RSA keypairs per day, using OpenSSL on a "handful" of Linux machines. What do folks think of the following: take one machine and dedicate it as an entropy source. After 'n'