Re: DeCSS MPAA New York Opinion

2000-02-04 Thread John Young
Phil, What happens to your court case when Commerce issues its letter? And for those of us who came late to crypto law, when did you initiate your suit? Which gives me a chance to say many thanks to you, and Dan and Peter, for educating the rest of us not only in how to effect crypto policy

Re: DeCSS MPAA New York Opinion

2000-02-04 Thread Rick Smith
At 03:19 PM 02/03/2000 -0800, Phil Karn wrote: This is one of the sloppiest and misinformed judicial opinions I've read in a long time. ... I read the hearing transcript and the judge seemed particularly impatient with the defense attorneys. There was the business about the defense attorneys

Re: DeCSS MPAA New York Opinion

2000-02-04 Thread John Young
Brad kemp wrote: It was interesting to note that the judge stated that 'DeCSS, or some version of it, contain programmer's comments, "which are non-executable appendages to lines of executable code"... Such comments are protected by the First Amendment' Does this mean the it is legal to post

DeCSS MPAA New York Opinion

2000-02-03 Thread John Young
Judge Kaplan has issued his Memorandum Opinion in the DeCSS MPAA v. 3 suit in New York: http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/courtweb/pdf/00-01149.PDF We offer an HTML version: http://cryptome.org/dvd-mpaa-3-mo.htm Judge Kaplan aims at settling the code as expression dispute, citing Bernstein,