IP: from Intel RE: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-26 Thread Lenny Foner
even for the supported media types (flash memory and microdrives). John Gilmore, a noted privacy and consumer advocate, has picked up the article and further propagated the erroneous information and mentioned Intel "IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives". I ha

Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-24 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 22:42:35 -0800 From: Somebody To: "R. A. Hettinga" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives --- begin forwarded text Subject: Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-22 Thread Antonomasia
The Register has broken a story of the latest tragedy of copyright mania in the computer industry. Intel and IBM have invented and are pushing a change to the standard spec for PC hard drives that would make each one enforce "copy protection" on the data stored on the hard drive. You

Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-22 Thread Jeff . Hodges
I didn't notice any relevant links in the Register article. A little pokin' with a search engine yielded.. Welcome to 4C Entity http://www.dvdcca.org/4centity/ For further (and possibly related) entertainment, see also.. Trusted Computing Platform Alliance http://www.trustedpc.org/ Reading

Re: About Gilmore's letter on IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-22 Thread Jeff . Hodges
I agree. I lived through the "physical" floppy disk copy-protection wars of the early 80's (wherein such copy-protection technologies fell out of popular usage) and am extremely skeptical about whether the market will accept this stuff for all the reasons you cite. JeffH

Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-22 Thread Jeff . Hodges
It's also innaresting to note that there's these hints in InterTrust's S-1/A filed way back in 1999-09-28 (note especially the second two).. . providers of secure digital distribution technology like ATT, IBM, Microsoft, Liquid Audio, Preview Systems, and Xerox; . providers of

Re: About Gilmore's letter on IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-22 Thread Alan Olsen
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree. I lived through the "physical" floppy disk copy-protection wars of the early 80's (wherein such copy-protection technologies fell out of popular usage) and am extremely skeptical about whether the market will accept this stuff for all

Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-22 Thread Eric Murray
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 10:42:15AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's also innaresting to note that there's these hints in InterTrust's S-1/A filed way back in 1999-09-28 (note especially the second two).. . providers of secure digital distribution technology like ATT, IBM,

Re: IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-22 Thread Jeff . Hodges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If they wern't involved in TCPA before Well actually, that excerpt of Intertrust's S1 was a listing of potential competitors in their discussion of risks. they are now- they just announced a deal with Wave Systems, who is a founder of TCPA.

IBMIntel push copy protection into ordinary disk drives

2000-12-21 Thread John Gilmore
The Register has broken a story of the latest tragedy of copyright mania in the computer industry. Intel and IBM have invented and are pushing a change to the standard spec for PC hard drives that would make each one enforce "copy protection" on the data stored on the hard drive. You wouldn't