On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 06:28:45PM -0700, Greg Broiles wrote:
This deserves further explanation. In order to begin an SSL session, the
server must present its public key and its site certificate to the client.
I think you're missing the point of the article. The issue is, what
happens when
At 04:35 PM 10/6/99 , Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
This is a problem with SSL 2.0 first discovered by Simon Spero then at EIT.
It was fixed in SSL 3.0, that must be almost three years ago.
The server certificate now binds the public key to a specific Web server
address.
That means that you can
Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 04:35 PM 10/6/99 , Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
This is a problem with SSL 2.0 first discovered by Simon Spero then at EIT.
It was fixed in SSL 3.0, that must be almost three years ago.
The server certificate now binds the public key to a specific Web
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Stewart writes:
At 04:35 PM 10/6/99 , Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
That means that you can only succeed against web-users whose browsers
still accept SSL2.0, which is most Netscape users by default;
I don't know if IE also defaults to that, but it probably
At 2:00 PM -0400 on 10/6/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Title: Special Kurt's Closet: Is SSL dead?
Resource Type: News letter
Date: Semptember 30, 1999
Source: Security Portal
Author: Kurt Seifried
Keywords: INTERNET/WWW,SECURITY ISSUES ,ONLINE SHOPPING ,SSL
Abstract/Summary
Phill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hettinga
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is SSL dead? (was Re: ECARM NEWS for October 06,1999 Second
Ed.
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robert Hettinga
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 1999 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is SSL dead? (was Re: ECARM NEWS for October 06,1999 Second
Ed.)
At 2:00 PM -0400 on 10/6/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Title
99 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is SSL dead? (was Re: ECARM NEWS for October 06,1999 Second
Ed.)
At 2:00 PM -0400 on 10/6/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Title: Special Kurt's Closet: Is SSL dead?
Resource Type: News letter
Date: Semptember 30, 19
