Unfortunately the bill doesn't go far
enough, in that individuals are left out in the cold: it's essentially
for the Microsofts and Netscapes of the industry to be exportable.
Everyone always says this, but no one ever says why.
Let's keep in mind that we're talking about software. The
At 5:14 PM -0500 3/11/99, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Anyone know anything about this?
Thursday March 11 11:15 AM ET
Bill To Relax U.S. Controls On Encryption Advances
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A bill to relax strict U.S. export controls on
computer data-scrambling products passed a small hurdle
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Anonymous wrote:
There are troublesome aspects to the SAFE bill, but this notion that it
is only for companies and won't benefit individual software developers
appears to be false. It would be helpful to know where this idea came
from, and to see what is behind it.
I
Anyone know anything about this?
Thursday March 11 11:15 AM ET
Bill To Relax U.S. Controls On Encryption Advances
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A bill to relax strict U.S. export controls on
computer data-scrambling products passed a small hurdle Thursday,
gaining approval from a House Judiciary
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Perry E. Metzger" writes:
Anyone know anything about this?
Thursday March 11 11:15 AM ET
Bill To Relax U.S. Controls On Encryption Advances
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A bill to relax strict U.S. export controls on
computer data-scrambling products passed a
The complete audio/video/written archives of that hearing are at
http://www.computerprivacy.org/archive/03041999/
The Deputy Director of the NSA (Barbara McNamara) testified; you can watch
the tape.
-Shabbir
At 5:27 PM -0500 3/11/99, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
