Re: please help FreeNet by becoming a node

2000-03-03 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Schear writes: At 09:56 AM 3/2/00 -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: It is worth noting that some bans on running servers are based on technology , not the business model of the provider. In IP over cable systems, there is much less bandwidth available

Re: please help FreeNet by becoming a node

2000-03-02 Thread Steve Schear
At 09:56 AM 3/2/00 -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: It is worth noting that some bans on running servers are based on technology, not the business model of the provider. In IP over cable systems, there is much less bandwidth available upstream than downstream, and it's much more expensive to add

Re: please help FreeNet by becoming a node

2000-03-02 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Stewart writes: It would be very nice if there were a Freenet _client_ instead of, or in addition to, the Freenet _server_. What's the functional difference? None, actually :-) The problem is that many US cable modem networks, and some US xDSL networks,

please help FreeNet by becoming a node

2000-03-01 Thread Eugene Leitl
(((I urge you to donate some of your computational/networking resources to the Freenet project, even if it's a single xDSL box. Details how to help see Latest News below.))) http://freenet.sourceforge.net/ "I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's too