"Steven M. Bellovin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], EKR writes:
I'm assuming it's compiled into the code, since if it were in the
cert database, it could be tampered with.
Sure -- just like Fortify can't exist...
Fair enough.
I would have kind of expected the
Maybe I'm just dense, but what's with the emphasis on phone
conversations? Voice processing is flaky at best, and computationally
expensive regardless. Faxes, on the other hand, can be OCR'ed easily, and
email is in plaintext to begin with.
-Bram
unless, of course, there's a built-in list of trusted CAs.
That's exactly what it is. Patching the list is apparently pretty
easy for Netscape Navigator -- instructions are included in the
mod_ssl Apache patch -- but it's not currently known what needs to
be done to make IE add a trusted CA.
Hi all
Saw some traffic on this list about our announcement of SuperCerts.
Yes, we have a full SGC licence, and have only been waiting for browser
revisions to be released that recognized our certs for 128-bit sessions.
Nav 4.7 and MSIE 5.01 now do this, hence our announcement.
Our licence
Marcus,
The answers to your questions, and more, are at:
http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/README.GlobalID
Cheers --
Enzo
- Original Message -
From: Marcus Leech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
Marcus Leech wrote:
So: two questions (with a possible answer of "use the source, luke"):
o What bits are set in a "super cert" to indicate that it's a SGC
or step-up cert? Or is it simply that certs issued by a super-cert
authority (as marked in the browser CA cert database)
Here's a thought exercise:
What happens if someone applies for an export license for a Java
Virtual Machine, which he intends to use as an "encryption routine"?
The idea (which is not new) is that a Java program (Java byte code)
would be the "key" for the encryption. It specifies how to turn
At 1:34 PM -0800 12/1/99, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:18:43 -0500
To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
CyberWire Dispatch // (c) Copyright 1999 // November 30
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacking in from the "Sticks
[I posted this earlier today but it never appeared, apologies if you've seen
it before. In any case the bit about the SigG card has been updated]
Martin Minow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Register http://www.theregister.co.uk reports that the Siemens
Digital Signature Chip used for cashless
At 20:49 12/01/1999 -0800, bram wrote:
Maybe I'm just dense, but what's with the emphasis on phone
conversations? Voice processing is flaky at best, and computationally
expensive regardless. Faxes, on the other hand, can be OCR'ed easily, and
email is in plaintext to begin with.
Probably (I do
Ron Rivest writes:
(*) A Post tag system has a number of rewrite rules of the form
L_i -- R_i
where L_i and R_i are strings over some alphabet (e.g. binary).
As long as the prefix of the input matches some L_i, that
L_i is removed from the beginning of the input, and
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Ron Rivest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If no per-key approval is needed, then I don't see why one can't
distribute code that embodies a fixed transformation procedure, since
this is really a "key" rather than a "program". That is, the
distributed specifies a single
Ron Rivest wrote:
Here's a thought exercise:
What happens if someone applies for an export license for a Java
Virtual Machine, which he intends to use as an "encryption routine"?
The idea (which is not new) is that a Java program (Java byte code)
would be the "key" for the encryption.
At 10:42 AM 12/02/1999 -0500, Arnold G. Reinhold wrote:
http://www.dragonsystems.com/products/audiomining/
"New AudioMiningĀ Technology Uses Award-Winning Speech Recognition
Engine to Quickly Capture and Index Information Contained in Recorded
Video Footage, Radio Broadcasts, Telephone
14 matches
Mail list logo
