"Arnold G. Reinhold" wrote:
At 7:39 PM -0800 3/14/2000, Eugene Leitl wrote:
Of course it ain't actual encryption, only (high-payload)
steganography at best. Now, if you sneak a message into a living
critter (a pet ("the message is the medium"), or creating the ultimate
self-propagating
Of course it ain't actual encryption, only (high-payload)
steganography at best. Now, if you sneak a message into a living
critter (a pet ("the message is the medium"), or creating the ultimate
self-propagating chainletter, a pathogen), that would be an
interesting twist.
Interesting is that
At 7:39 PM -0800 3/14/2000, Eugene Leitl wrote:
Of course it ain't actual encryption, only (high-payload)
steganography at best. Now, if you sneak a message into a living
critter (a pet ("the message is the medium"), or creating the ultimate
self-propagating chainletter, a pathogen), that would
Arnold G. Reinhold writes:
If you know the DNA sequences of alphabet letters, you can PCR probe
for common words or word fragments like "the" or "ing" and avoid
total sequencing.
That's true. Luckily, there is no such test for random base sequences,
though a pseudorandom sequence would
