On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Aaron Whitehouse wrote:
Oh, and make it small enough to fit in the pocket,
put a display *and* a keypad on it, and tell the
user not to lose it.
How much difference is there, practically, between this and using a
smartcard credit card in an external reader with a
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
I don't know who *else* has said it, but I've said this repeatedly at
conferences. With phased arrays, you should be able to read RFID tags
at surprising distances, and in spite of attempts to jam such signals
(such as RSA's proposed RFID privacy
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 03:23:21PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
The technology will mature *very* rapidly if Virginia makes their
driver's licenses RFID-enabled, or if the US goes ahead with the
passports. Why? Because there will be a stunning amount of money to
be stolen by not identity
From: Michal Ludvig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VIA PadLock reloaded
To: James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CryptoAPI List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:55:03 +0200
From: Michal Ludvig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:55:03 +0200
To: James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| I'm pretty sure that you are answering the question
| Why did Microsoft buy Connectix?
|
| The answer to that one is actually To provide a
| development environment for Windows CE (and later XP
| Embedded) (the emulator that's used for development
|
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:58:56AM -0400, Dave Emery wrote:
| On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 03:23:21PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
|
| The technology will mature *very* rapidly if Virginia makes their
| driver's licenses RFID-enabled, or if the US goes ahead with the
| passports. Why? Because
http://www.financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/000219.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... to break the conundrum Ballmer finds himself
in where the road forks towards (1) fix the security
problem but lose backward compatibility, or (2) keep
the backward compatibility but never fix the problem.
I
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 03:23:21PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
5 years? I don't think we have that long.
The technology will mature *very* rapidly if Virginia makes their
driver's licenses RFID-enabled, or if the US goes ahead with the
passports. Why? Because there will be a stunning
From: Mark J Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OpenSSL 0.9.7e released
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:49:49 +0100 (BST)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark J Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:49:49 +0100 (BST)
To:
Marshall Clow wrote:
At 10:44 PM -0700 10/20/04, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 05:23 PM 10/18/2004, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/low/technology/3753886.stm
It's not clear that they work at all with inkjet printers,
and changing ink cartridges is even more common than
changing laser
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aaron Whitehouse
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:58 AM
To: Ian Grigg
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Financial identity is *dangerous*? (was re: Fake
companies,
real money)
Ian Grigg
11 matches
Mail list logo
