On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote:
Isn't this just a clarification of existing CALEA practice?
In most jurisdictions, if a communications services provider is served
an order to make available communications, it is required by law to
provide it in the
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite previous reassurances about the security of the system,
Nate Lawson of Root Labs claims that the unique identity numbers
used to identify the FasTrak wireless transponders carried in cars
can be copied
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Dustin D. Trammell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the same for the state-wide Texas tag, TxTag[1]. If your tag
doesn't register, or you disable or remove it, the toll system can still
accurately bill you based on your license plate and vehicle
registration.
A lot of people seem to agree with what Declan McCullagh writes here:
It's going to make us rethink how we handle laptops in sleep mode and servers
that use
encrypted filesystems (a mail server, for instance).
What I'd like to know is why people weren't already rethinking this
when people
On 7/9/07, alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes me wonder how this will effect the OpenMoko phone if someone builds
an encryption layer for it. (OpenMoko is a totally open sourced phone.)
Leigh Honeywell and Paul Wouters presented a 'crypto-phone' effort
they have been working on at CCC in
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
The bigger issue, though, is more subtle: keeping track of the keys
is non-trivial. These need to be backed up, too, and kept separate
from (but synchronized with) the tapes. Worse yet, they need to be
kept secure. That may mean storing the keys with a different
