On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jerry Leichter leich...@lrw.com wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
If we can't select ciphersuites that we are sure we will always be
comfortable with (for at least some forseeable lifetime) then we urgently
need the
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
On 10/8/13 at 7:38 AM, leich...@lrw.com (Jerry Leichter) wrote:
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
We seriously need to consider what the design lifespan of our crypto suites
is in
.
-- Jerry
___
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
Sincerely,
Watson Ladd
--
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Lodewijk andré de la porte
l...@odewijk.nlwrote:
IMO readability is very hard to measure. Likely things being where you
expect them to be, with minimal confusing characters but clear anchoring
so you can start reading from anywhere.
If someone could write a
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:21 PM, James A. Donald jam...@echeque.com wrote:
On 2013-10-01 00:44, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Should one also accuse ESTREAM of maliciously weakening SALSA? Or
might one admit the possibility that winning designs in contests
are at times quite conservative and that
of finding linear approximations to the encryption function.
But I personally don't think this is much use. We have ciphers that have
stood up to lots of analysis. The real problems have been in modes of
operation, key negotiation, and deployment.
Sincerely,
Watson Ladd
