On 08/27/2013 01:17, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:39:16 -0400 The Doctor dr...@virtadpt.net
wrote:
On 08/26/2013 09:26 AM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Mix networks are, however, a well technique. Onion networks, which
are related, are widely deployed right now in the form of
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:40:35 -0400 Phillip Hallam-Baker
hal...@gmail.com wrote:
There has to be a layered approach.
Traffic analysis is probably going to demand steganography and that
is almost by definition outside standards work.
I'm unaware of anyone who has seriously proposed
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:38:21 -0700 Carl Ellison c...@acm.org wrote:
Meanwhile PRISM was more about metadata than content, right? How
are we going to prevent traffic analysis worldwide?
The best technology for that is mix networks.
At one point, early in the cypherpunks era, mix networks were
There has to be a layered approach.
Traffic analysis is probably going to demand steganography and that is
almost by definition outside standards work.
The part of Prism that I consider to be blatantly unconstitutional is that
they keep all the emails so that they can search them years later
