On Mar 4, 2005, at 5:23 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
The attacks on MD*/SHA* are weak and esoteric.
On this we respectfuly disagree.
You make it sound trivial. Wang has been working on these results for
over 10 years. She received the largest applause at Crypto 2004 session
from her peers I have
--
On 23 Feb 2005 at 21:37, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
I don't know if there's quite the need for open process for a
hash function as there was for a secrecy algorithm. The AES
process, after all, had to cope with the legacy of Clipper
and key escrow, to say nothing of the 25 years of DES
Burt Kaliski posted the following to Dave Farber's IP list. I was
about to post something similar myself.
Beyond that, it is now clear that the industry needs an open evaluation
process -- like the Advanced Encryption Standard competition -- to establish
a new hash function standard for the
Full disclosure: Burt Kaliski and I share an employer.
Peter Trei
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of David Farber
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 7:48 PM
To: Ip
Subject: [IP] One cryptographer's perspective on the SHA-1 result
From
