On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:41:10AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Taral wrote:
Neat, but not (yet) useful... only these TLDs have DS records:
The rest will follow soon. And it is not that you had to stop those
TLD trust anchors just now.
actually, soon is a
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Taral wrote:
Neat, but not (yet) useful... only these TLDs have DS records:
The rest will follow soon. And it is not that you had to stop those
TLD trust anchors just now.
Several are using old SHA-1 hashes...
old ?
Paul
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com wrote:
Several are using old SHA-1 hashes...
old ?
old in that they are explicitly not recommended by the latest specs
I was looking at.
--
Taral tar...@gmail.com
Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give
The root zone has been signed, and the root zone trust anchor has
been published.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:35:39 +
From: Joe Abley joe.ab...@icann.org
To: na...@nanog.org
Subject: Root Zone DNSSEC Deployment Technical Status Update
Root Zone DNSSEC Deployment
Perry E. Metzger wrote:
The root zone has been signed, and the root zone trust anchor has
been published.
That's a great achievement for the parties involved. It is also a
significant step towards more trustworthy DNS data.
I have been following this with attention from the perspective of
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com wrote:
The root zone has been signed, and the root zone trust anchor has
been published.
Neat, but not (yet) useful... only these TLDs have DS records:
bg. 172800 IN DS 46846 5 1
