Re: New Attack on Secure Browsing

2004-07-21 Thread Jon Callas
On 15 Jul 2004, at 9:36 PM, Aram Perez wrote: I'm not sure if PGP deliberately set out to confuse naïve users since their logo has been the padlock for a while. Many web sites have their logo displayed on the address bar (and tab) when you go to there site, see http://www.yahoo.com or

Re: New Attack on Secure Browsing

2004-07-16 Thread Aram Perez
Hi Ian, Congratulations go to PGP Inc - who was it, guys, don't be shy this time? - for discovering a new way to futz with secure browsing. Click on http://www.pgp.com/ and you will see an SSL-protected page with that cute little padlock next to domain name. And they managed that over

Re: New Attack on Secure Browsing

2004-07-16 Thread Ian Grigg
Aram, It's now pretty clear that PGP had no clue what this was all about. Apologies to all, that was my mistake. Also, to clarify, there was no SSL involved. What we are looking at is a case of being able to put a padlock on the browser in a place that *could* be confused by a user. This is an

RE: New Attack on Secure Browsing

2004-07-16 Thread Anton Stiglic
You stated that http://www.pgp.com is an SSL-protected page, but did you mean https://www.pgp.com? On my Powerbook, with all the browsers I get an error that the certificate is wrong and they end up at http://www.pgp.com. What I get is a bad certificate, and this is due to the fact that the

Re: New Attack on Secure Browsing

2004-07-16 Thread Ian Grigg
Anton Stiglic wrote: You stated that http://www.pgp.com is an SSL-protected page, but did you mean https://www.pgp.com? On my Powerbook, with all the browsers I get an error that the certificate is wrong and they end up at http://www.pgp.com. What I get is a bad certificate, and this is due to

New Attack on Secure Browsing

2004-07-15 Thread Ian Grigg
Financial Cryptography Update: New Attack on Secure Browsing ) July 15, 2004 http://www.financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/000179.html