On 09/13/2013 11:32 PM, Jerry Leichter wrote:
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
There are a class of hyper-cheap USB audio dongles with very uncomplicated
mixer models. A small flotilla of those might get you some fault-tolerance.
My main thought on such things relates to
On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:06 PM, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
There are a class of hyper-cheap USB audio dongles with very uncomplicated
mixer models. A small flotilla of those might get you some fault-tolerance.
My main thought on such things relates to servers, where power consumption
isn't
At 08:32 PM 9/13/2013, Jerry Leichter wrote:
If by server you mean one of those things in a rack at Amazon or
Google or Rackspace - power consumption, and its consequence,
cooling - is *the* major issue these days. Also, the servers used
in such data centers don't have multiple free USB
On 09/12/2013 10:38 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
The audio subsystem actually posed *two* obvious opportunities:
amplifier noise from channels with high final stage gain but connected
by a mixer to muted inputs, and clock skew between system timers and
audio sample clocks. The former
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Marcus D. Leech mle...@ripnet.com wrote:
I wonder what people's opinions are on things like the randomsound daemon
that is available for Linux.
I have not looked at that. A well thought out well documented
RNG based on a sound card is:
On 09/10/2013 12:04 PM, Rob Kendrick wrote:
I wonder what people's opinions are on things like the randomsound
daemon that is available for Linux.
Daniel Silverstone, the author, specifically advises people to not use
it. :)
I haven't actually looked at the code. Conceptually, anything with an
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:59:37AM -0400, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
I wonder what people's opinions are on things like the randomsound
daemon that is available for Linux.
Daniel Silverstone, the author, specifically advises people to not use
it. :)
B.
