[Moderator's note: Forwarded anonymously at the sender's request, so
if you reply to this, please cut my name out of it, it isn't my
message --Perry]
--
Perry, please forward anonymously.
On Friday, Oct 10, 2003, at 22:48
Peter Clay wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Peter Gutmann wrote:
I would add to this the observation that rather than writing yet another SSL
library to join the eight hundred or so already out there, it might be more
useful to create a user-friendly management interface to IPsec implementations
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Peter Gutmann wrote:
I would add to this the observation that rather than writing yet another SSL
library to join the eight hundred or so already out there, it might be more
useful to create a user-friendly management interface to IPsec implementations
to join the zero or
Peter Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you want a VPN that road warriors can use, you have to do it with IP-over-
TCP. Nothing else survives NAT and agressive firewalling, not even Microsoft
PPTP.
IP-over-TCP has some potential performance problems, see
Peter Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having spent much of the past few weeks trying to sort out a workable VPN
solution, I think this is a good but doomed idea. http://vpn.ebootis.de/
has the best free windows IPsec configuration tool I've found, but that
doesn't help. Why? Because IPsec
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:56:47AM +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
I would add to this the observation that rather than writing yet another SSL
library to join the eight hundred or so already out there, it might be more
useful to create a user-friendly management interface to IPsec implementations
Jill Ramonsky wrote:
Too late. I've already started. Besides which, posts on this group
suggest that there is a demand for such a toolkit.
I think there's demand in the sense that there's demand for free
lunches. People would like the inherent complexity to go away, because
they can see that
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open Source (was Simple SSL/TLS - Some Questions)
I think that rather than spending time on deciding what to call this
library that is to-be-written, and how to license this library that is
to-be-written, that time should be spent on, well, writing
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Open Source (was Simple SSL/TLS - Some Questions)
Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would add
I took the initial view that closed source and trustable
crypto are mutually incompatible
Of course this isn't true. When is the last time you built your
own ATM or credit-card POS terminal?
Claims such
as Download this app and you will be secure should definitely need to
be proven, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
