Scott G. Kelly wrote:
Here's another approach to password authenticated key exchange with
similar security claims. The underlying mechanism is under
consideration for inclusion in by the 802.11s group in IEEE:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-01.txt
Hmmm. I don't
Scott G. Kelly wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Scott G. Kelly wrote:
Here's another approach to password authenticated key exchange with
similar security claims. The underlying mechanism is under
consideration for inclusion in by the 802.11s group in IEEE:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Scott G. Kelly wrote:
Here's another approach to password authenticated key exchange with
similar security claims. The underlying mechanism is under
consideration for inclusion in by the 802.11s group in IEEE:
-eap-pwd-01.txt
-Original Message-
From: Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 30, 2008 2:27 PM
To: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Cryptography cryptography@metzdowd.com
Subject: Re: Unpatented PAKE!
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/passwdPK/submissions/hao-ryan-2008.pdf
At last.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/passwdPK/submissions/hao-ryan-2008.pdf
At last.
See also:
http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/05/29/j-pake/
Looks quite interesting indeed.
Perry