Ivan Krstic wrote:
Owen Blacker wrote:
I wanted to create a file system that was
deniable: where encrypted files looked like random noise, and where it
was impossible to prove either the existence or non-existence of
encrypted files.
I spent some time thinking about this a few years back:
OK, I'll say it. This site:
http://www.truecrypt.org/
makes me visualize tinfoil hats.
--dan
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, I'll say it. This site:
http://www.truecrypt.org/
makes me visualize tinfoil hats.
TrueCrypt is definitely deep tinfoil-hat crypto (I have an upcoming article on
disk-encryption software that goes into this in more detail). That's rather
unfortunate, because
Owen Blacker wrote:
I wanted to create a file system that was
deniable: where encrypted files looked like random noise, and where it
was impossible to prove either the existence or non-existence of
encrypted files.
I spent some time thinking about this a few years back:
On 5/2/06, Ivan Krstic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I spent some time thinking about this a few years back:
http://diswww.mit.edu/bloom-picayune/crypto/15520
Rubberhose was one of the things that came up, along with StegFS and
BestCrypt. Unfortunately, it seems like Rubberhose hasn't seen work in
From: Owen Blacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Deniable File System
To: UK Crypto list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:43:18 +0100 (BST)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/04/deniable_file_s.html
Some years ago I did some design work on something I
