On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Anton Stiglic wrote:
The problem is not really authentication theft, its identity theft, or if
you want to put it even more precisely, it's identity theft and
authenticating as the individual to whom the identity belongs to. But the
latte doesn't make for a good buz-word :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gerck
Sent: 7 juillet 2004 14:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: identification + Re: authentication and authorization
I believe that a significant part of the problems discussed here is that
the three
Hi Ed and others,
Like usual, you present some very interesting ideas and thoughts. The
problem is that while we techies can discuss the identity theft definition
until we are blue in the face, the general public doesn't understand all the
fine subtleties. Witness the (quite amusing) TV ads by
Aram Perez wrote:
Hi Ed and others,
Like usual, you present some very interesting ideas and thoughts. The
problem is that while we techies can discuss the identity theft definition
until we are blue in the face, the general public doesn't understand all the
fine subtleties. Witness the (quite
I believe that a significant part of the problems discussed here is that
the three concepts named in the subject line are not well-defined. This
is not a question of semantics, it's a question of logical conditions
that are at present overlapping and inconsistent.
For example, much of what is
