--
James A. Donald:
My two most recent logins were with First National
Bank of Omaha and Your IBM Savings plan
Is firstnational.com the same entity as First
National Bank of Omaha? Is
https://lb22.resources.hewitt.com; the same entity
as Your IBM Savings plan
From: Ben
Reportedly, some people demonstrated falsifying votes on Diebold voting
machines using only resources and techniques available to thousands of election
workers. It will be interesting to see the fallout. These weaknesses have
apparently long been known, but denied by Diebold.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:56:11 -0600, Travis H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solinym Anytime someone wants to rewrite a C library in a language
solinym less prone to buffer overflows, I'm totally for it. Some say
solinym that it's not the library, it's the programmer, but
On 12/18/05, Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would happen at least as much as it happens with
https, and it happens enough with https that false
negatives enormously outweigh true negatives.
True, but I don't see false negatives very often with https at all. And
I visit far more
On 12/19/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C has three really strong points:
- portability. It's one of the most wide-spread and portable
compiled languages that I know of.
I beg your pardon? If I want to store 128 bits of information, and
access the 8 most
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:19:37 -0600, Travis H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solinym On 12/19/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solinym C has three really strong points:
solinym
solinym - portability. It's one of the most wide-spread and
On 12/19/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unsigned char foo[8];
(no, it isn't fool proof, but close enough after 1 second of thought).
I think C guarantees that a char is a byte, but exactly how wide that
is is processor-dependent. IIRC, some of the machines it was
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:12:16 -0600, Travis H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solinym On 12/19/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solinym unsigned char foo[8];
solinym
solinym (no, it isn't fool proof, but close enough after 1 second
solinym of
Schneier mentions whooping values (whoops? I don't know the precise
term) in doing modular arithmetic. I was wondering what people
thought of this.
Basically if you've got a huge finite field, and do arithmetic on it,
the whoop values are the residues in a much smaller field that is
unknown to
Paragraph 40, below, is about as bald a statement as an NSA director
could make, saying he needs help to decide what he should be allowed
to wiretap about US persons. We, the privacy community, did not
respond. We were a bit surprised, but that was about the extent of
the support we offered.
Of
10 matches
Mail list logo
