On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 21:33 -0500, Ivan Krsti? wrote:
If you give me the benefit of the doubt for having a reasonable
general grasp of the legal system and not thinking the judge is an
automaton or an idiot, can you explain to me how you think the judge
can meet the burden of proof for
Hi Peter,
Apart from the obvious fact that if the TPM is good for DRM then it is also
good for protecting servers and the data on them,
In which way, and for what sorts of protection? And I mean that as a
serious inquiry, not just a Did you spill my pint? question. At the moment
the sole
Excerpt:
Aussie govt considers quantum leap in secure comms
Commonwealth departments to trial Quantum Key Distribution.
Australian governments may soon have the world's most secure data
communication system if trials of a locally-developed quantum
cryptography technology are
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Kent Yoder shpedoi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
Apart from the obvious fact that if the TPM is good for DRM then it is also
good for protecting servers and the data on them,
In which way, and for what sorts of protection? And I mean that as a
serious
