[ This is a reminder, prompted by the fact that two individuals dug
into their wallets and made a small contribution each. I've also
heard from a few people who are talking with their management, so
far without too much else happening.
Through this, I want to make it clear that small
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:41:56 -0600, Anne Lynn Wheeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
lynn At 07:07 PM 7/24/2004, Peter Gutmann wrote:
lynn A depressing number of CAs generate the private key themselves
lynn and mail out to the client. This is another type of PoP, the
lynn
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:16:21 -0700, Eric Rescorla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ekr Does anyone know the details of the certificate generation
ekr algorithms used by various CAs?
Variants I've heard of are:
- A simple counter starting at 0 (well, actually, I know this
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:16:11 -0500, Trei,
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
ptrei Admittedly somewhat old and creaky, but try Googling
ptrei RSAREF. I don't know where that stands for IP rights
ptrei (presumably we still have copyright), bout for
ptrei research it's a
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 Beta 5
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The fifth beta is now
released. The beta release is available for download via HTTP and
FTP from the following
OpenSSL version 0.9.8 released
==
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 0.9.8 of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. This new
OpenSSL
OpenSSL version 0.9.7i released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL 0.9.7h caused crashes when the shared libcrypto was
upgraded. This release fixes that problem. For those who want
or have to stay
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:56:11 -0600, Travis H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solinym Anytime someone wants to rewrite a C library in a language
solinym less prone to buffer overflows, I'm totally for it. Some say
solinym that it's not the library, it's the programmer, but
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:19:37 -0600, Travis H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solinym On 12/19/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solinym C has three really strong points:
solinym
solinym - portability. It's one of the most wide-spread
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:12:16 -0600, Travis H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
solinym On 12/19/05, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
solinym unsigned char foo[8];
solinym
solinym (no, it isn't fool proof, but close enough after 1 second
solinym
10 matches
Mail list logo
