On 19 Sep 2013 19:11, Bill Frantz fra...@pwpconsult.com wrote:
On 9/19/13 at 5:26 AM, rs...@akamai.com (Salz, Rich) wrote:
I know I would be a lot more comfortable with a way to check the mail
against a piece of paper I
received directly from my bank.
I would say this puts you in the sub
On 18 Sep 2013 07:44, Christoph Gruber gr...@guru.at wrote:
On 2013-09-17 Max Kington mking...@webhanger.com wrote:
[snip]
Hence, store in the clear, keep safe at rest using today's archival
mechanism and when that starts to get dated move onto the next one
en-masse, for all your media
On 17 Sep 2013 15:47, Christoph Gruber gr...@guru.at wrote:
On 2013-09-16 Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
If people are sending email through the corporate email system then in
many cases the corporation has a need/right to see what they are
sending/receiving.
[snip]
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.comwrote:
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:55:05 -0400 John Kelsey crypto@gmail.com
wrote:
Everyone,
The more I think about it, the more important it seems that any
anonymous email like communications system *not* include
On 11 Sep 2013 18:37, Bernie Cosell ber...@fantasyfarm.com wrote:
The recent flood of discussions has touched on many modern attacks on
cryptosystems. I'm long out of the crypto world [I last had a crypto
clearance *before* differential cryptanalysys was public info!]. Attacks
that leak a
This space is of particular interest to me. I implemented just one of
these and published the protocol (rather than pimp my blog if anyone wants
to read up on the protocol description feel free to email me and I'll send
you a link).
The system itself was built around a fairly simple PKI which
