On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Brandon Enright bmenr...@ucsd.edu wrote:
Steven M. Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
Jon Callas j...@callas.org wrote:
The accepted wisdom
on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
and
On Wed, 6 May 2009 20:54:34 -0400
Steven M. Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
Jon Callas j...@callas.org wrote:
The accepted wisdom
on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
and other things) is that it is to be retired by
At 8:54 PM -0400 5/6/09, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
Jon Callas j...@callas.org wrote:
The accepted wisdom
on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
and other things) is that it is to be retired by the end of 2010.
That's an
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:44:53 -0700
Jon Callas j...@callas.org wrote:
The accepted wisdom
on 80-bit security (which includes SHA-1, 1024-bit RSA and DSA keys,
and other things) is that it is to be retired by the end of 2010.
That's an interesting statement from a historical perspective -- is