On Oct 7, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Bernie Cosell wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
What about http://www.truecrypt.org/docs/?s=plausible-deniability
Could this be
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Nicolas Williams wrote:
If decryption results in plaintext much shorter than the ciphertext -much
shorter than can be explained by the presence of a MAC- then it'd be fair to
assume that you're pulling this trick.
Not to argue with your overall point re: crypto not
Am 06.10.2010 um 22:57 schrieb Marsh Ray:
On 10/06/2010 01:57 PM, Ray Dillinger wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
I am thankful to not be an English
On Oct 7, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Christoph Gruber gr...@guru.at wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
What about
On 7 Oct 2010 at 12:05, Jerry Leichter wrote:
On Oct 7, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Christoph Gruber gr...@guru.at wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
What about
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 01:10:12PM -0400, Bernie Cosell wrote:
I think you're not getting the trick here: with truecrypt's plausible
deniability hack you *CAN* give them the password and they *CAN* decrypt
the file [or filesystem]. BUT: it is a double encryption setup. If you
use one
On 10/07/2010 12:10 PM, Bernie Cosell wrote:
There's no way to tell if you used the
first password that you didn't decrypt everything.
Is there a way to prove that you did?
If yes, your jailers may say We know you have more self-incriminating
evidence there. Your imprisonment will continue
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
I suppose that, if the authorities could not read his stuff
without the key, it may mean that the software he was using may
have
On 10/06/2010 01:57 PM, Ray Dillinger wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
I am thankful to not be an English subject.
I suppose that, if the authorities could
On 6 October 2010 11:57, Ray Dillinger b...@sonic.net wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
16 weeks, says the article.
On 06/10/10 19:57, Ray Dillinger wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
Just to correct this: the sentence was 16 weeks, not 16 months.
The legislation in
On 10/06/2010 03:55 PM, Joss Wright wrote:
The .. Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act of 2000 (RIPA), ..
allows for a maximum sentence of two years for refusing a
request that encrypted data be put into an intelligible form.
Five years, if a national security or child indecency case.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Ray Dillinger b...@sonic.net wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
I suppose that, if the authorities could not read his stuff
13 matches
Mail list logo
