At 10:39 AM -0700 7/4/09, Hal Finney wrote:
But how many other hash function candidates would also be excluded if
such a stringent criterion were applied? Or turning it around, if NIST
demanded a proof of immunity to differential attacks as Rivest proposed,
how many candidates have offered such a
Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 10:39 AM -0700 7/4/09, Hal Finney wrote:
But how many other hash function candidates would also be excluded if
such a stringent criterion were applied? Or turning it around, if NIST
demanded a proof of immunity to differential attacks as Rivest proposed,
how many
At 10:39 AM -0700 7/4/09, Hal Finney wrote:
But how many other hash function candidates would also be excluded if
such a stringent criterion were applied? Or turning it around, if NIST
demanded a proof of immunity to differential attacks as Rivest proposed,
how many candidates have offered such a
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:39 -0700, Hal Finney wrote:
Rivest:
Thus, while MD6 appears to be a robust and secure cryptographic
hash algorithm, and has much merit for multi-core processors,
our inability to provide a proof of security for a
reduced-round (and possibly
At 11:49 PM -0400 7/3/09, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Here's the essential paragraph:
Thus, while MD6 appears to be a robust and secure cryptographic
hash algorithm, and has much merit for multi-core processors,
our inability to provide a proof of security for a
Rivest:
Thus, while MD6 appears to be a robust and secure cryptographic
hash algorithm, and has much merit for multi-core processors,
our inability to provide a proof of security for a
reduced-round (and possibly tweaked) version of MD6 against
differential
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:51:47 -0700
Joseph Ashwood ashw...@msn.com wrote:
--
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:05 PM
Subject: MD6 withdrawn from SHA-3 competition
Also from Bruce Schneier, a report that MD6 was withdrawn from the
SHA-3
On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:51:47 -0700 or thereabouts Joseph Ashwood
ashw...@msn.com wrote:
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:05 PM
Subject: MD6 withdrawn from SHA-3 competition
Also from Bruce Schneier, a report that MD6 was withdrawn from the
SHA-3 competition because of performance
--
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 4:05 PM
Subject: MD6 withdrawn from SHA-3 competition
Also from Bruce Schneier, a report that MD6 was withdrawn from the SHA-3
competition because of performance considerations.
I find this disappointing
Also from Bruce Schneier, a report that MD6 was withdrawn from the SHA-3
competition because of performance considerations.
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/07/md6.html
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
10 matches
Mail list logo