No, it only makes it illegal to use false or misleading information to
send commercial e-mail. That's a rather important distinction.
So, I get non-commercial emails all the time, from topica mailing
lists and from people forwarding New York Times articles and such.
They come with embedded
The natural consequence of zero-cost (free) speech
is to make freedom from speech (privacy) unquenchably
attractive.
If you would preserve anonymity, you must raise the
costs of those who will not shut up. We technocrats
have had years to do something and we have not; the
ball is now in other
John Gilmore wrote:
This bill makes it a crime to use any false or misleading information
in a domain name or email account application, and then send an email.
That would make a large fraction of hotmail users instant criminals.
Why? Can't you register a domain using a proxy? I think this
This bill makes it a crime to use any false or misleading information
in a domain name or email account application, and then send an email.
No, it only makes it illegal to use false or misleading information to
send commercial e-mail. That's a rather important distinction.
Anonymous
This bill makes it a crime to use any false or misleading information
in a domain name or email account application, and then send an email.
That would make a large fraction of hotmail users instant criminals.
It also makes it a crime to remove or alter information in message
headers in ways that
