ClearCrypt's goal is to produce a minimalist transport encryption library
written in a memory-safe language: Rust.
Web site: http://clearcrypt.org/
The problem: http://clearcrypt.org/tls/
Github repo: https://github.com/clearcrypt/clearcrypt
The project is presently complete vaporware, but the
On 2014-05-03, at 3:22 AM, pjklau...@gmail.com pjklau...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, if we could trust in DNS, we would not need to trust in
web-PKIX [2] - since the one is just the bandaid for the other.
Have you forgotten that routing can be subverted?
Just because you are talking to the
On 4 May 2014 23:54, Tony Arcieri basc...@gmail.com wrote:
The project is presently complete vaporware, but the goal is to produce a
Rust implementation of a next generation transport encryption library. The
protocol itself is still up for debate, but will likely be based off
CurveCP or
On May 4, 2014, at 6:39 PM, Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
On 2014-05-03, at 3:22 AM, pjklau...@gmail.com pjklau...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, if we could trust in DNS, we would not need to trust in
web-PKIX [2] - since the one is just the bandaid for the other.
Have you
Very cool stuff Tony!
Major props to you on getting this going! =D
I'm not super familiar with CurveCP, but was rather impressed with MinimaLT
after reading their paper.
Can you discuss your thoughts on those two, the pros and cons of each, why you
chose one over the other, and whether you'll
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Greg g...@kinostudios.com wrote:
Can you discuss your thoughts on those two, the pros and cons of each, why
you chose one over the other, and whether you'll consider changing your
mind? ^_^
No specific choices have been made yet. CurveCP and MinimaLT are both
In article eb40b06c-907f-42ee-be88-45361561e...@goldmark.org you write:
On 2014-05-03, at 3:22 AM, pjklau...@gmail.com pjklau...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly, if we could trust in DNS, we would not need to trust in
web-PKIX [2] - since the one is just the bandaid for the other.
Have you forgotten
