Message du 13/05/14 05:55
De : grarpamp
A : cypherpu...@cpunks.org
Copie à : p2p-hack...@lists.zooko.com, cryptography@randombit.net
Objet : Re: [cryptography] The next gen P2P secure email solution
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:49 AM, rysiek wrote:
Dnia wtorek, 22 kwietnia 2014 20:58:50
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.comwrote:
In general any proposal of the form 'lets replace X with something 10%
'better'' is a losing proposition. Particularly when we are talking
about systems where network effects dominate such as protocols, APIs
and
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.comwrote:
JSON is a lot more than 10% better than ASN.1 or XML because both of the
latter are bjorked. XML prefixes are insane
And TLS isn't? ;)
--
Tony Arcieri
___
cryptography
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:36 AM, tpb-cry...@laposte.net wrote:
- Email is entrenched in the offices, many a business is powered by it;
They are powered by authorized access to and useful end use of message
content, not by email. That's not going anywhere, only the intermediate
transport is
Oh boy, here we go.
Message du 15/05/14 23:14
De : grarpamp
http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/05/good-news-for-privacy-fewer-servers-sending-e-mail-naked-facebook-finds/
I think that answers your concern about SMTP transport in the clear
Yes, great, we're now moving towards strict
pesky to/from/subject/etc headers.
Oh boy, here we go.
Those are hidden by use of TLS.
Have you not been following the weaknesses intrinsic
to SMTP discussions?
Yes, they are hidden in TLS transport on the wire.
No, they are not hidden in core or on disk at
the intermediate and final message
