On 14 April 2016 at 00:16, Jerry Leichter wrote:
>>> Yes, make it significantly smaller than the current form factor.
>>
>> Ah. OK, well, that is certainly doable, though how small you can make it is
>> ultimately limited by the size of the display. How small do you want it,
On Apr 14, 2016, at 2:36 AM, stef wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:12:52PM -0700, Tony Arcieri wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>> Well, that's true, but it's also hundreds of times bigger than a token in
>> the Yubikey "nano"
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:12:52PM -0700, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
> Well, that's true, but it's also hundreds of times bigger than a token in
> the Yubikey "nano" form factor, which is actually convenient to keep
> permanently in
On Apr 13, 2016, at 4:16 PM, Jerry Leichter wrote:
>>> Yes, make it significantly smaller than the current form factor.
>>
>> Ah. OK, well, that is certainly doable, though how small you can make it is
>> ultimately limited by the size of the display. How small do you want
On Apr 13, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> On 4/13/16 at 10:14 AM, r...@flownet.com (Ron Garret) wrote:
>
>> Here’s a photo of an earlier version of the HSM using a seven-segment
>> display instead of the current 128x32 pixel OLED, next to the current
>> version
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
> Is that small enough for you?
>
Yes, that's significantly better. Sorry if I was overly negative before.
--
Tony Arcieri
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
On Apr 13, 2016, at 8:27 AM, John Ioannidis wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
>> One of the biggest challenges in crypto is protecting your keys against an
>> attacker who pwns your machine. The fundamental problem is that such an
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
> Tony: I really don’t mind negative feedback when it’s constructive. In
> fact, I very much appreciate it. But I’m really having a hard time
> discerning a constructive purpose in your critique. What exactly do you
> think
On Apr 13, 2016, at 8:56 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Thierry Moreau
> wrote:
> Who wants to be optimistic with respect to threat models in the current IT
> landscape?
>
> I prefer to be realistic about threats,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Thierry Moreau <
thierry.mor...@connotech.com> wrote:
> Who wants to be optimistic with respect to threat models in the current IT
> landscape?
I prefer to be realistic about threats, especially when UX tradeoffs are
involved
--
Tony Arcieri
On 13/04/16 03:12 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ron Garret > wrote:
This HSM is much more general-purpose than a U2F token.
Well, that's true, but it's also hundreds of times bigger than a token
in the Yubikey "nano"
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
> This HSM is much more general-purpose than a U2F token.
>
Well, that's true, but it's also hundreds of times bigger than a token in
the Yubikey "nano" form factor, which is actually convenient to keep
permanently in the USB
On Apr 12, 2016, at 5:39 PM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
> Some hardware tokens have an input device built in (usually a push button,
> sometimes a fingerprint sensor) which needs to be activated before the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Ron Garret wrote:
> Some hardware tokens have an input device built in (usually a push button,
> sometimes a fingerprint sensor) which needs to be activated before the
> token will operate, but these are still subject to phishing attacks
Not
14 matches
Mail list logo