Re: [cryptography] Well, that's depressing. Now what?

2012-01-28 Thread Noon Silk
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: [BTW, I held off saying anything until the first post.  I'd wanted to see how long we could collectively avoid the same old QKD thread.  It took five hours to the first post, fourteen to get to the first significant

Re: [cryptography] Well, that's depressing. Now what?

2012-01-28 Thread Noon Silk
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote: On Jan 27, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Noon Silk wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote: Or at least that's what everyone thought. More recently, various groups have begun to

Re: [cryptography] Well, that's depressing. Now what?

2012-01-28 Thread Noon Silk
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Noon Silk noonsli...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: Until we see scalable quantum authenticated quantum secrecy / key

Re: [cryptography] Well, that's depressing. Now what?

2012-01-28 Thread Nico Williams
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Noon Silk noonsli...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: I don't see how I could have been much more specific given the two things you quoted from me. As I said, you could point to specific products that