Some OT comments to an OT response...
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:30 AM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
On 7/04/13 09:38 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
[big snip]
We've built a house of cards, not so much on the Internet as
on the web (but not only!). Web application security is complete
mess. And
On 8/04/13 04:06 AM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Kevin W. Wall kevin.w.w...@gmail.com writes:
I think you're giving the NSA way too much credit on why security sucks. Even
if we were to restrict 'security' to the scope of cryptography, even there, I
think the NSA has much less to do with dumbing down
On Apr 8, 2013, at 7:38 AM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
We all know stories. DES is now revealed as interfered with, yet for decades
we told each other it was just parity bits.
But it turned out that the interference was to make it *stronger* against
attacks, differential cryptanalysis,
On 6/04/13 07:27 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:17 PM, NgPS n...@rulemaker.net wrote:
In the movies and presumably in real life, bad guys have smart crooked
lawyers advising them. Surely the bad guys have the resources to set up
bunch of servers a la iMessage/Whatsapp, and
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:51:06PM +0300, ianG wrote:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57577887-38/apples-imessage-encryption-trips-up-feds-surveillance/
iang, who never even knew it was encrypted!
Presumably messages are stored in clear text on Apple's servers, similarly
on servers of
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:39:31PM -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
Basically, this is complaint by the DEA is disinformation or
misinformation (or both!). If the former case we might even be
staring at the start of a new crypto wars period.
In the movies and presumably in real life, bad guys have
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:17 PM, NgPS n...@rulemaker.net wrote:
In the movies and presumably in real life, bad guys have smart crooked
lawyers advising them. Surely the bad guys have the resources to set up
bunch of servers a la iMessage/Whatsapp, and write/deploy their own apps on
their mobile
In a project similar to Wikileaks, ICIJ comments on tools it used to
secure its team-based project work:
ICIJ’s team of 86 investigative journalists from 46 countries
represents one of the biggest cross-border investigative partnerships in
journalism history. Unique digital systems
On 4/04/13 21:43 PM, Jon Callas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 4, 2013, at 6:27 AM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
In a project similar to Wikileaks, ICIJ comments on tools it used to secure its
team-based project work:
ICIJ’s team of 86 investigative
On Apr 4, 2013, at 4:51 PM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
On 4/04/13 21:43 PM, Jon Callas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Apr 4, 2013, at 6:27 AM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
In a project similar to Wikileaks, ICIJ comments on tools it used to secure
its team-based
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:51 PM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
On 4/04/13 21:43 PM, Jon Callas wrote:
This is great. It just drives home that usability is all.
Just to underline Jon's message for y'all, they should have waited for
iMessage:
Encryption used in Apple's iMessage chat service
ianG i...@iang.org writes:
An internal Drug Enforcement Administration document seen by CNET discusses
a February 2013 criminal investigation and warns that because of the use of
encryption, it is impossible to intercept iMessages between two Apple
devices even with a court order approved by a
On 2013-04-05 10:47 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
How does it work? Is it really secure, and if it is, how did they
manage a not one click for security user interface?
Already answered by others on this list. Not secure, apple can MIM it.
___
On 5/04/13 05:36 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
On 2013-04-05 10:47 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
How does it work? Is it really secure, and if it is, how did they
manage a not one click for security user interface?
Already answered by others on this list. Not secure, apple can MIM it.
Seems
14 matches
Mail list logo
