(the only sense in which this makes sense).
Joseph Ashwood
Trust Laboratories
http://www.trustlaboratories.com
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen C. van Gelderen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a scenario: Scott wants Alice to generate a key pair after
which he will receive Alice's public key. At the same time, Scott wants
to make sure that this key pair is newly generated (has not been used
before).
- Original Message -
From: Roy M.Silvernail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And here, I thought that a portion of the security embodied in a SecurID
token was the fact that it was a tamper-resistant, independent piece of
hardware. Now M$ wants to put the PRNG out in plain view, along with its
seed
- Original Message -
From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The important part for this, is that TCPA has no key until it has an
owner,
and the owner can wipe the TCPA at any time. From what I can tell this
was
designed for resale of components, but is perfectly suitable as a point
of
This is going to be a very long, and very boring message. But it should
highlight why we have differing opinions about so very many capabilities of
the TCPA system. For the sake of attempting to avoid supplying too little
information, I have simply searched for the term and will make comments on
- Original Message -
From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
There is nothing stopping a virtualized version being created.
What prevents this from being useful is the lack of an appropriate
certificate for the private key in the TPM.
Actually that does nothing
- Original Message -
From: AARG! Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[brief description of Document Revocation List]
Seth's scheme doesn't rely on TCPA/Palladium.
Actually it does, in order to make it valuable. Without a hardware assist,
the attack works like this:
Hack your software (which is
[I've got some doubts about the content here but I think the
discussion is certainly on charter --Perry]
Since I have received a number of private replies all saying approximately
the same thing; lookup for small n, use algo for large. Allow me to extend
my observation.
To quote myself from
- Original Message -
From: John S. Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Honig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Hannes R. Boehm' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Ian
Hill' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2002 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: building a true RNG
I wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: building a true RNG (was: Quantum Computing ...)
I've got a framegrabber with a 640x480 24 bit/pixel camera. It doesn't
compress, is rather noisy, and since self-adjusting I get the maximum
entropy at maximum
- Original Message -
From: John Saylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:14 PM
Subject: authentication protocols
I'd like to find an authentication protocol that fits my needs:
1. 2 [automated] parties
2. no trusted 3rd party intemediary ['Trent'
11 matches
Mail list logo
