Re: NYC events and cell phones

2001-09-20 Thread Allen Ethridge
[Moderator's note: I was under the impression most base stations did the crypto in hardware, so the answer would be no, no performance gain for such equipment. Besides, the main concern would be open channels, not CPU load. Anyone know better? --Perry] It's my understanding that functions like

Re: NYC events and cell phones

2001-09-19 Thread Damien Miller
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Greg Rose wrote: There is one very simple reason why they might have wanted the encryption switched off. Wiretapping at the base station requires a wiretap order, whereas sniffing the airwaves in a matter of national security is something the NSA is allowed to do (but

Re: NYC events and cell phones

2001-09-16 Thread Greg Rose
At 01:53 AM 9/17/2001 +0100, Peter Fairbrother wrote: It is possible that damage to basestations or volume of traffic may have caused this failure. Possibly, the telco switched it off to maintain service. Equally, the FBI/NSA etc may have switched it off, but I don't know why they would bother -

Re: NYC events and cell phones

2001-09-15 Thread Bill Stewart
At 07:59 AM 09/13/2001 -0400, Angelos D. Keromytis wrote: An interesting bit of information: on Tuesday afternoon, to the extend that cellphones operated, GSM encryption was turned off throughout Manhattan. My GSM phone would repeatedly warn me of this on every call I made (or tried to make). As

NYC events and cell phones

2001-09-13 Thread Angelos D. Keromytis
An interesting bit of information: on Tuesday afternoon, to the extend that cellphones operated, GSM encryption was turned off throughout Manhattan. My GSM phone would repeatedly warn me of this on every call I made (or tried to make). As of Wednesday morning, things were back to normal. Does