Has anyone ever weighted a PGP key's certification value as a
function of how many keys it's know to have certified?
The PGP keyserver folks perform a regular public keyring analysis:
http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/2003-03-23/
http://dtype.org/keyanalyze/
Cheers,
Stefan.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:36:20AM -0500, Ian Grigg wrote:
| So, do we have two completely disjoint communities
| here? One group that avoids photo id and another
| that requires it? Or is one group or the other so
| small that nobody really noticed?
Yes.
One group thinks that a bad trust
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Ian Grigg wrote:
I must be out of touch - since when did
PGP key signing require a photo id?
It does not. It is improper for a key-signing organizer to dictate signing
policy to individuals. When I wrote the Efficient Group Key Signing Method
paper[1], I specifically
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
It's rather efficient if you want to sign a large number of keys of
people you mostly do not know personally.
Right, but remember that knowing people personally was supposed
to be part of the point of vouching for their identity to others.
I
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 22:32 US/Eastern, bear wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
It's rather efficient if you want to sign a large number of keys of
people you mostly do not know personally.
Right, but remember that knowing people personally was supposed
to be part of
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 00:22, Jeroen van Gelderen wrote:
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 22:32 US/Eastern, bear wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
It's rather efficient if you want to sign a large number of keys of
people you mostly do not know personally.
Right,
On Tuesday, Mar 25, 2003, at 00:36 US/Eastern, Ian Grigg wrote:
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 00:22, Jeroen van Gelderen wrote:
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 22:32 US/Eastern, bear wrote:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
It's rather efficient if you want to sign a large number of keys
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
On Saturday 22 March 2003 17:12, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
I will be organizing a keysigning session for CFP2003. Please submit
I must be out of touch - since when did
PGP key signing require a photo id?
It's rather efficient if you want to sign a large number of keys of
people you mostly do not know personally.
Assuming, of course, that the ID is of a sort for which you have an
is-a-forgery oracle.
Has anyone
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Matt Crawford wrote:
Has anyone ever weighted a PGP key's certification value as a
function of how many keys it's know to have certified?
An interesting idea: At one extreme you could view the whole
universe as having a finite amount of trust and every
certification is a
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 07:52, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
I must be out of touch - since when did
PGP key signing require a photo id?
It is an usual requirement for a keysigning party to bring a photo ID to
validate if theirs key ids are the same as their names (and to get class 3
key
On Saturday 22 March 2003 17:12, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
I will be organizing a keysigning session for CFP2003. Please submit
your keys to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will print out
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 11:00 US/Eastern, Ian Grigg wrote:
On Saturday 22 March 2003 17:12, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
I will be organizing a keysigning session for CFP2003. Please submit
your keys to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I will print out sheets with key
information in order to speed up the
13 matches
Mail list logo
