Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism

2001-07-27 Thread Declan McCullagh
On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:53:02PM -0400, David Jablon wrote: With these great new laws, there is no longer any risk of being legally criticised for using even the most glaringly flawed cryptography -- just use it for Copy Protection, and TADA! Negative criticism magically disappears. Almost

Java Anon Proxy - any reactions?

2001-07-27 Thread Udhay Shankar N
I found this interesting-looking project for anonymous web use here: http://anon.inf.tu-dresden.de/index_en.html has anybody used this? Is it reliable? Udhay _ Udhay Shankar N Iponics India Pvt

Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism

2001-07-27 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Declan McCullagh writes: One of those -- and you can thank groups like ACM for this, if my legislative memory is correct -- explicitly permits encryption research. You can argue fairly persuasively that it's not broad enough, and certainly 2600 found in the DeCSS

Re: Criminalizing crypto criticism

2001-07-27 Thread Arnold G. Reinhold
At 1:56 AM -0400 7/27/2001, Declan McCullagh wrote: On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 10:53:02PM -0400, David Jablon wrote: With these great new laws, there is no longer any risk of being legally criticised for using even the most glaringly flawed cryptography -- just use it for Copy Protection, and