- Original Message -
From: InfoSec News [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 8:38 AM
Subject: [ISN] Aust Defence wont disclose stance on encryption
http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/security/story/0,224985,20260593,00.htm
?chkpt=zdnn_nbs_h
By
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 06:19:43PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
My point was higher level. These systems are either already broken or
fragile and very lightly peer reviewed. There aren't many people
building and breaking them.
To elaborate on this slightly. There are inherent reasons why
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Declan McCullagh wrote:
http://www.wartimeliberty.com/article.pl?sid=01/09/21/2220202
WorldNetDaily Reports WTC Terrorists Used Encryption
posted by admin on Friday September 21, @05:17PM
There must be something about encryption and terrorists in
the
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Nomen Nescio wrote:
If the internal circuitry did output a 60Hz sine wave then regularities
would still be visible after this kind of whitener. It is a rather
mild cleanup of the signal.
It does mask patterns to an extent, possibly pushing them inside the
margin for
--
On 22 Sep 2001, at 16:11, Adam Back wrote:
There will be a never-ended stream of more refined and
accurate models of the signal itself, and biases in the
equipment that collects the signal. So there will be
always a risk that the detecter gets the edge by marginally
more accurately
