Re: password-cracking by journalists...

2002-01-18 Thread Matt Blaze
17 USC 1204 (a) In General. - Any person who violates section 1201 or 1202 willfully and for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain -(1) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both, for the first offense... Does this

Re: password-cracking by journalists...

2002-01-18 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message v0421010cb86ca9bc4254@[192.168.0.2], Arnold G. Reinhold writes: At 9:15 AM -0500 1/16/02, Steve Bellovin wrote: A couple of months ago, a Wall Street Journal reporter bought two abandoned al Qaeda computers from a looter in Kabul. Some of the files on those machines were encrypted.

@Stake's Wysopal on Bill's Bull (was re: [ISN] Security guruswelcome Microsoft's goal)

2002-01-18 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Status: U Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 01:18:29 -0600 (CST) From: InfoSec News [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ISN] Security gurus welcome Microsoft's goal Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: InfoSec News [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: password-cracking by journalists...

2002-01-18 Thread Will Rodger
Arnhold writes: Another interesting question is whether the reporters and the Wall Street Journal have violated the DCMA's criminal provisions. The al Qaeda data was copyrighted (assuming Afghanistan signed one of the copyright conventions--they may not have), the encryption is arguably a

Re: password-cracking by journalists...

2002-01-18 Thread Arnold G. Reinhold
At 9:41 AM -0500 1/18/02, Will Rodger wrote: Arnhold writes: Another interesting question is whether the reporters and the Wall Street Journal have violated the DCMA's criminal provisions. The al Qaeda data was copyrighted (assuming Afghanistan signed one of the copyright conventions--they

Re: Horseman Number 3: Osama Used 40 bits

2002-01-18 Thread Ben Laurie
Trei, Peter wrote: [Moderator's note: It wasn't a direct quote, and I generally assume reporters misquote people anyway. Also, note that the general confusion because the UK uses thousand million for the US billion makes the whole thing even less clearly the expert and not the reporter.