On 20 Jan 2002 21:46:35 -0500, Derek Atkins said:
Question: How many users of PGP 2.x are still out there? If people
have upgraded to more recent versions, then it's not quite as bad.
OTOH, I have successfully interoperated with PGP 2.6 fairly recently.
Things would get much better if a PGP
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 16:02:07 +1300 (NZDT), Peter Gutmann said:
There are already a number of S/MIME gateways which do exactly this.
The most typical mode of operation is org-to-org, where all mail
from an organisation is
BTW, there is such a gateway for OpenPGP at ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/geam/
John Gilmore wrote:
Brad Templeton has been kicking around some ideas on how to make
zero-UI encryption work (with some small UI available for us experts
who care more about our privacy than the average joe).
That's an interesting article. I wrote Whisper
(http://234.cx/whisper.php) as a
http://interactive.wsj.com/archive/retrieve.cgi?id=SB1011563728915181760.djmtemplate=printing.tmpl
January 21, 2002
Tech Center
Nationwide Concerns About Security Boost
Computer-Safety Firms to Strong Results
By ANN GRIMES
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
Safety concerns buoyed
Karsten M. Self[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
Note that my reading the language of 1201 doesn't requre that the work
being accessed be copyrighted (and in the case of Afghanistan, there is
a real question of copyright status), circumvention itself is
sufficient, regardless of status of
If you ask me GPG has as much to answer for in the
non-interoperability problems with it's rejection of shipping IDEA
with the default GPG as PRZ et al for deciding to not ship RSA.
I tried arguing with PGP that if they wanted to phase out RSA use, the
best way would be to support it: then more
Brad's point about writing encryption software for Windows, as you often
write email to people who use Windows, so you know your email is safe on
*both* ends, has merit, and if Windows was at all secure I'd agree, but...
Another point about this type of zero-UI encryption is that you don't
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 08:50:22PM +, Adam Back wrote:
GPG on the other hand is simply wilfully damaging interoperability by
putting their anti-patent stance over the benefit of PGP users. I
know there are modules to add IDEA support but they're not shipped by
default so most people
on Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:55 AM -0500, Trei, Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Karsten M. Self[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
Note that my reading the language of 1201 doesn't requre that the work
being accessed be copyrighted (and in the case of Afghanistan, there is
a real question
Will Rodger wrote:
It included all sorts of people traipsing up to
Capitol Hill to make sure that ordinary research and system maintenance,
among other things, would not be prosecuted.
I think our understanding of the DMCA has changed
significantly since it was first introduced, and it's
not
10 matches
Mail list logo
