Adam Shostack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:38:42AM -0700, Brian A. LaMacchia wrote:
There are two parts to answering the first question:
1) People (many people, the more the merrier) need to understand the
code and what it does, and thus be in a position to be able to
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26231.html
MS white paper says Palladium open, clean, not DRM
By John Lettice
Posted: 17/07/2002 at 09:25 GMT
A final draft of Microsoft's Palladium consultation white
paper appears to have escaped, and is currently being hosted
by Neowin.net. Microsoft
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
Lately on both of these lists there has been quite some discussion about
TCPA and Palladium, the good, the bad, the ugly, and the anonymous. :)
However there is something that is very much worth noting, at least about
TCPA.
There is nothing stopping a virtualized
At 10:58 PM 8/13/2002 -0700, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
Lately on both of these lists there has been quite some discussion
about TCPA and Palladium, the good, the bad, the ugly, and the
anonymous. :) However there is something that is very much worth
noting, at least about TCPA.
There is nothing
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Joseph Ashwood wrote:
However there is something that is very much worth noting, at least about
TCPA.
There is nothing stopping a virtualized version being created.
There is nothing that stops say VMWare from synthesizing a system view that
includes a virtual TCPA
The remote attesation is the feature which is in the interests of
third parties.
I think if this feature were removed the worst of the issues the
complaints are around would go away because the remaining features
would be under the control of the user, and there would be no way for
third parties
--
On 14 Aug 2002 at 9:31, Seth Johns
Some voices within the company (and we currently believe
these voices to be right and sensible) hold the view that
Palladium has to be about users' security if it's to stand
any chance of winning hearts and minds, and that associating
it with
- Original Message -
From: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joseph Ashwood wrote:
There is nothing stopping a virtualized version being created.
What prevents this from being useful is the lack of an appropriate
certificate for the private key in the TPM.
Actually that does nothing to
