Re: get a grip on what TCPA is for

2002-08-16 Thread Derek Atkins
John S. Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But how to trust a machine when you don't have physical custody? Even the most-skilled members of this list would find that a challenge (depending, as I have emphasized before, on what your threat model is). Note that this is not the only

Re: employment market for applied cryptographers?

2002-08-16 Thread Hadmut Danisch
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 02:23:05AM +0100, Adam Back wrote: Other explanations? Same effect here in Germany. I'm under the impression that security was never really done for security reasons, but as a kind of fashion. Do it because everyone is doing it. It's a problem of the decision makers.

Re: TCPA not virtualizable during ownership change

2002-08-16 Thread James A. Donald
-- On 15 Aug 2002 at 15:26, AARG! Anonymous wrote: Basically I agree with Adam's analysis. At this point I think he understands the spec equally as well as I do. He has a good point about the Privacy CA key being another security weakness that could break the whole system. It

Re: TCPA not virtualizable during ownership change (Re: Overcoming thepotential downside of TCPA)

2002-08-16 Thread lynn . wheeler
I arrived at that decision over four years ago ... TCPA possibly didn't decide on it until two years ago. In the assurance session in the TCPA track at spring 2001 intel developer's conference I claimed my chip was much more KISS, more secure, and could reasonably meet the TCPA requirements at

employment market for applied cryptographers?

2002-08-16 Thread Adam Back
On the employment situation... it seems that a lot of applied cryptographers are currently unemployed (Tim Dierks, Joseph, a few ex-colleagues, and friends who asked if I had any leads, the spate of recent security consultant .sigs, plus I heard that a straw poll of attenders at the codecon

Re: employment market for applied cryptographers?

2002-08-16 Thread Adam Shostack
Hey, this is off-topic for DRM-punks! ;) more seriously: I think the fundamental issue is that crypto doesn't really solve many business problems, and it may solve fewer security problems. See Bellovin's work on how many vulnerabilities would be blocked by strong crypto. The buying public can't

Re: employment market for applied cryptographers?

2002-08-16 Thread Perry E. Metzger
Adam Back [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Are there any more definitive security industry stats? Are applied crypto people suffering higher rates of unemployment than general application programmers? (From my statistically too small sample of acquaintances it might appear so.) Hard to say.

Cryptographic privacy protection in TCPA

2002-08-16 Thread AARG!Anonymous
Here are some more thoughts on how cryptography could be used to enhance user privacy in a system like TCPA. Even if the TCPA group is not receptive to these proposals, it would be useful to have an understanding of the security issues. And the same issues arise in many other kinds of systems