--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:31:49 -0500
From: IanG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Back [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Digital Bearer Settlement List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: security of limits
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:32:54 +
From: Adam Back [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IanG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Digital Bearer Settlement List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: security of limits in mondex (Re: Spending
At 11:40 PM +0100 11/11/02, Niels Ferguson wrote:
At 12:03 11/11/02 -0500, Arnold G. Reinhold wrote:
[...]
One of the tenets
of cryptography is that new security systems deserve to be beaten on
mercilessly without deference to their creator.
I quite agree.
I hope you won't mind another round
We've gone through all the main argument here, and I think it is clear we
don't agree. I started writing a detailed reply to your last message, but
most of it was just argueing that we need authentication on 802.11 packets.
TGi had a limited brief: improve the security for 802.11, and that
