Single Signon by ITSELF is not a bad technology. But it very much
depends on the architecture and implementation. A Globally
Centralized SSO system like Passport certainly has problems as you
suggest. A locally centralized SSO system like Kerberos is less
of an issue. A Federated SSO system
Hi Perry,
It seems that all on the list might have read A Cost-Based Security Analysis of
Symmetric and Asymmetric Key Lengths by Robert D. Silverman :-)
and have similiar lines of thought.Or may be they are just too bored of this...
BTW I did try to get hold of Nicko's old costing analysis
The Liberty Alliance was stillborn to begin with. Not that it made any
practical difference, but the Liberty Alliance received an additional
bullet through the head the day that RSA Security, a key participant in
the Liberty Alliance, announced that they would also support Microsoft
Passport.
At 09:12 PM 01/26/2003 -0500, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
It's just silly to spend, say, $50 more, on a more secure lock unless
you are really willing, in the forseeable future, to spend hundreds or
thousands of dollars or even more on other weaknesses to make most of
them approximately as strong.
Rich Salz wrote:
Liberty is architected to be federated, unlike Passport.
The Liberty Alliance was stillborn to begin with. Not that it made any
practical difference, but the Liberty Alliance received an additional
bullet through the head the day that RSA Security, a key participant in
the
[Moderator's Note: normally I don't think of this list as a mini ebay,
but in this case... --Perry]
Hello,
Do you know anyone who wants to buy a M-209-B?
I have one I'm looking to shift.
regards,
Dr. Owen Williams
Faculty of Applied Design and Engineering,
Swansea Institute of Higher
