At 02:17 AM 12/05/2002 +, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
OK, suppose we've got a bank that issues bearer money.
Who owns the bank? It should be owned by bearer shares, of course.
Why?
Or the propounders wanting to: make a profit/control the bank?
There are two main reasons honest people start
Schear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DBCs now issued by DMT
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Monetary Trust now supports Digital Bearer
Certificates. https://196.40.46.24/dmtext/jog/dmt_bearercert.htm Although
the DBC are not blinded, DMT claims it maintains no client data on its
accounts so
At 4:06 PM -0800 on 12/3/02, Somebody wrote:
I forgot to ask: who the hell is DMT?
Nobody I ever heard of...
How are they marketing this
stuff -
on a website with only an IP address... :-).
or, who have they gotten to use it thus far?
Nobody I ever heard of...
However, that old
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:06:12 -0800
Subject: Re: DBCs now issued by DMT
From: Tim May [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 01:55 PM, Steve Schear wrote:
Digital Monetary Trust now supports
OK, suppose we've got a bank that issues bearer money.
Who owns the bank? It should be owned by bearer shares, of course.
Can any clever person here devise such a protocol?
I'd guess that all the Bank's finances should be available to anyone who
asks. That should include an accounting of all
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
OK, suppose we've got a bank that issues bearer money.
Who owns the bank? It should be owned by bearer shares, of course.
Can any clever person here devise such a protocol?
I thought about this problem for several months.
The problem I kept
