On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 05:00:12PM -0800, Eric Young wrote:
openSSL on a PIII-633Mhz can do 265 512 bit CRT RSA per
I don't know what the OpenSSL people did to the x86 ASM code, but
SSLeay (the precursor to OpenSSL, over 3 years old) did/does 330
512bit and 55 1024 bit RSAs a second on a
At 5:04 PM -0500 on 3/23/02, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
During the internet stock bubble, his investors, self-described
Wave-oids, would haunt the investor web-chats and shout down anyone who
talked about actual revenue as a short focused on the Next Big Thing in
Entertainment Technology.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Secure peripheral cards
R. A. Hettinga wrote:
...
I'm not sure NCipher gear is the #1 for acceleration, I think they're
probably more focussed and used for secure key management. For
example they quote [1] an nForce can do up to 400 new SSL
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 03:39:01PM +1100, Greg Rose wrote:
But don't forget that your pentium can't do anything *else* while it's
doing those RSAs... whereas the machine with the nForce can be actually
servicing the requests.
While that is true, the issue is the economics; depending on the
At 7:21 PM -0500 on 3/20/02, Roop Mukherjee wrote:
I am searching for some citable references about secure peripheral cards.
Contrary to what I had imagined when I had started searching, I found very
little. I am looking to see what are the peripherals that have
cryptographic capabilities
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:02:20AM -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 7:21 PM -0500 on 3/20/02, Roop Mukherjee wrote:
I am searching for some citable references about secure peripheral cards.
Contrary to what I had imagined when I had started searching, I found very
little. I am looking
Well, there's always the IBM 4758, which we built as a general-purpose
secure computer environment for hostile environments, with the ability
for on-device applications to prove to the outside world what they are
and where they're running.
IBM's been marketing it primarily as a crypto
