which he claimed to have
made on the list when the discussion was on Bernstein ,but with no luck.
regards
anish
-Original Message-
From: Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 26 Jan 2003 19:29:08 -0500
Subject: Shamir factoring machine uninteresting?
I find
I worte -
implemented?), and 3-4 orders is not that big of a magnitude.
I take that back. When considering cost, 3-4 orders of magnitude is
important.
--Anton
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending
I find it odd that there has been so little comment on TWIRL. One
would think that the crushing of 512 bit RSA keys and a strong
demonstration of the weakness of 1024 bit RSA keys would have provoked
some comment on the list.
Any comments on why no one commented?
--
Perry E. Metzger
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 07:29:08PM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
I find it odd that there has been so little comment on TWIRL. One
would think that the crushing of 512 bit RSA keys and a strong
demonstration of the weakness of 1024 bit RSA keys would have provoked
some comment on the list.