Victor Duchovni victor.ducho...@morganstanley.com writes:
What are EE certs, did you mean EV?
End-entity certs, i.e. non-CA certs. This means that potentially after the
end of this year and definitely after 2013 it will not be possible to use any
key shorted than 2048 bits with Firefox.
Thierry Moreau thierry.mor...@connotech.com writes:
The PUDEC (Practical Use of Dice for Entropy Collection) scheme has been
advanced. The new web page is at http://pudec.connotech.com
Plus the PUDEC dice sets are now offered for sale.
Hmm, they're somewhat expensive... a cheaper alternative,
Matt Crawford craw...@fnal.gov writes:
EE = End Entity, but I don't read the first sentence the way Peter did.
As I mentioned in my previous followup, it's badly worded, but the intent is
to ban any keys 2K bits of any kind (currently with evolving weasel-words
about letting CAs certify them
Am 06.10.2010 um 22:57 schrieb Marsh Ray:
On 10/06/2010 01:57 PM, Ray Dillinger wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
I am thankful to not be an English
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11483008
BBC reports that Microsoft's idea seems to be that if your computer
doesn't present a valid health certificate to your ISP, then your
ISP wouldn't let it be on the net, or would throttle it down to a tiny
bandwidth. The Health Certificate would, of
On 06/10/10 Ray Dillinger said:
It is hard to count the number of untestable and/or flat out wrong
assumptions built into this idea, and harder still to enumerate all the
ways it could go wrong.
My wife runs Clamwin AV on her windows XP box and it's always complaining that
she doesn't have
I'd love to know how they plan to validate my Linux boxes.
OpenPTS [1] + TrouSerS [2] + Grub-IMA [3] + IMA [4] ;-)
Kent
[1] http://openpts.sourceforge.jp/
[2] http://trousers.sourceforge.net/
[3] http://sourceforge.jp/projects/openpts/wiki/GRUB-IMA
[4] http://linux-ima.sourceforge.net/
On Oct 7, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Christoph Gruber gr...@guru.at wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
What about
On 7 Oct 2010 at 12:05, Jerry Leichter wrote:
On Oct 7, 2010, at 4:14 AM, Christoph Gruber gr...@guru.at wrote:
a 19-year-old just got a 16-month jail sentence for his refusal to
disclose the password that would have allowed investigators to see
what was on his hard drive.
What about
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Steven Bellovin wrote:
|
| On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:19 01PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
|
| ATT debuts a new encrypted voice service. Anyone know anything about
| it?
|
| http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20018761-17.html
|
| (Hat tip to Jacob
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 01:10:12PM -0400, Bernie Cosell wrote:
I think you're not getting the trick here: with truecrypt's plausible
deniability hack you *CAN* give them the password and they *CAN* decrypt
the file [or filesystem]. BUT: it is a double encryption setup. If you
use one
On 10/07/2010 12:10 PM, Bernie Cosell wrote:
There's no way to tell if you used the
first password that you didn't decrypt everything.
Is there a way to prove that you did?
If yes, your jailers may say We know you have more self-incriminating
evidence there. Your imprisonment will continue
At 3:16 AM -0700 10/7/10, John Gilmore wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11483008
BBC reports that Microsoft's idea seems to be that if your computer
doesn't present a valid health certificate to your ISP, then your
ISP wouldn't let it be on the net, or would throttle it down to a
13 matches
Mail list logo
