Re: [Cryptography] Separating concerns

2013-08-29 Thread ianG
Hi Phill, On 28/08/13 21:31 PM, Phill wrote: And for a company it is almost certain that 'secure against intercept by any government other than the US' is an acceptable solution. I think that was acceptable in general up until recently. But, I believe the threat scenario has changed, and

Re: [Cryptography] Separating concerns

2013-08-29 Thread Jerry Leichter
On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Faré wrote: My target audience, like Perry's is people who simply can't cope with anything more complex than an email address. For me secure mail has to look feel and smell exactly the same as current mail. The only difference being that sometime the secure

Re: [Cryptography] Separating concerns

2013-08-29 Thread Phillip Hallam-Baker
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Jerry Leichter leich...@lrw.com wrote: On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Faré wrote: My target audience, like Perry's is people who simply can't cope with anything more complex than an email address. For me secure mail has to look feel and smell exactly the same

Re: [Cryptography] Separating concerns

2013-08-28 Thread Phill
On Aug 28, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Faré fah...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Phill hal...@gmail.com wrote: My target audience, like Perry's is people who simply can't cope with anything more complex than an email address. For me secure mail has to look feel and smell exactly

Re: [Cryptography] Separating concerns

2013-08-28 Thread Faré
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Phill hal...@gmail.com wrote: My target audience, like Perry's is people who simply can't cope with anything more complex than an email address. For me secure mail has to look feel and smell exactly the same as current mail. The only difference being that