I dont think its too bad, its fairly intuitive and related english meaning
also. At zero-knowlege we had a precedent of the same use: we used it as an
intentional pun that we had zero-knowledge about our customers, and in
actuality in one of the later versions we actually had a ZKP (to do with
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Peter Gutmann
pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nzwrote:
active use of ECC suites on the public Internet is practically nonexistent
That's not entirely accurate; try www.google.com.
Bodo
___
cryptography mailing list
[Bodo Moeller bmoel...@acm.org (2013-02-13 14:26:56 UTC)]
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Peter Gutmann
pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nzwrote:
active use of ECC suites on the public Internet is practically nonexistent
That's not entirely accurate; try www.google.com.
I didn't know that.
- Forwarded message from Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com -
From: Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:14:36 +0100
To: z...@lists.illumos.org
CC: Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com,
Richard Elling richard.ell...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [zfs] Edon-R
- Forwarded message from Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com -
From: Sašo Kiselkov skiselkov...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:01:08 +0100
To: z...@lists.illumos.org
CC: Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org,
Garrett D'Amore garrett.dam...@gmail.com,
Richard Elling
On Feb 13, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Peter Gutmann pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
Bodo Moeller bmoel...@acm.org writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Peter Gutmann
pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nzwrote:
active use of ECC suites on the public Internet is practically nonexistent
That's not
Those are some pretty odd stats... Camellia is almost as popular as 3DES?
Well, it is what we see :).
And all in all Camellia is even more popular than 3DES in our data set (there
are some more less popular cipher suites for both 3DES and Camellia).
It is pretty close though.
Bernhard
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:27 PM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
AFAIK, the term 'least authority' as used by Tahoe-LAFS folks does not
refer to 'zero knowledge' as per cryptographic protocols, but to the
concept of least authority as derived from the 'capabilities' school of
security thought.
I